Von Hohn v. Von Hohn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that each partner was assigned “an undivided profits account and a capital account”; this was clearly an asset of the community
• holding that because no money had been received by husband’s law firm from pending but unsettled cases, revenue from those cases was no more than an expectancy interest, and any money to be received constituted future earnings to which wife was not entitled
• explaining that partnership agreement set value of partner’s interest in event of partner’s death, withdrawal, retirement, or expulsion but did not control value of individual partnership interest in event of divorce
• holding that because no money had been received by husband’s law firm from pending but unsettled cases, revenue from those cases was no more than an expectancy interest, and any money to be received constituted future earnings to which wife was not entitled
• holding that because no money had been received by husband’s law firm from pending but unsettled cases, revenue from those cases was no more than an expectancy interest, and any money to be received constituted future earnings to which wife was not 18 entitled
• holding that because no money had been received by husband = s law firm from pending but unsettled cases, revenue from those cases was no more than an expectancy interest, and any money to be received constituted future earnings to which wife was not entitled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).