Licata v. Licata

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that recitals in settlement agreement that the payment was for physical pain, mental anguish, physical disfigurement, and other intangible damages created a rebuttable presumption that the settlement 6 proceeds were the wife’s separate property
• settlement agreements specifically pointed out nature of payments as separate property by describing types of damages compensated by settlement
• settlement agreements specifically pointed out nature of payments as separate property by describing types of damages compensated by settlement
• settlement agreements specifically pointed out nature of payments as separate property by describing types of damages compensated by settlement
• settlement agreements specifically pointed out nature of payments as separate property by describing types of damages compensated by settlement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).