Tenth Circuit· 12/13/1993

Vitkus v. Beatrice Co.

Citations

11 F.3d 1535
1993 WL 514824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating summary judgment may be granted if the evidence presented by the nonmovant is not significantly probative
stating a mere “scintilla” of evidence will not avoid summary judgment
summary judgment is appropriate where the evidence is merely colorable or is not significantly probative
“However, the nonmoving party may not rest on its pleadings but must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial as to those dispositive matters for which it carnes the burden of proof.”
“Because the Release is ambiguous, the determination of what the parties 17 Appellate Case: 21-1025 Document: 010110679283 Date Filed: 05/03/2022 Page: 54 intended to be included within its scope is a fact question for the jury.”
“However, the nonmoving party may not rest on its pleadings but must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial as to those dispositive matters for which it carries the burden of proof.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldock, Ebel, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

289 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.