Virgil v. Garlock, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that [an asbestos] plaintiff must present evidence that he inhaled asbestos fibers shed by the specific manufacturer’s product”
• saying that a court considering a demurrer must review the record in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party
• rejecting contention that a plaintiff in an asbestos case must present expert testimony as to how many asbestos fibers are contained in dust emissions from a particular asbestos-containing product
• rejecting contention that a plaintiff in an asbestos case must present expert testimony as to how many asbestos fibers are contained in dust emissions from a particular asbestos-containing product

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).