Skip to main content
· 3/24/1994

Virgil Jean v. William E. Dugan

Citations

  • 20 F.3d 255
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5596
  • 1994 WL 93936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that under Indiana law, a federal court ruling on a defamation summary judgment motion must ask whether the evidence presented is such that a reasonable jury might find that actual malice had been shown with convincing clarity
  • applying Indiana law and holding that a claim for retaliatory discharge accrues upon termination of employment
  • in a defamation case where the conduct at issue is publication, the place of the alleged tort is the place of injury, which under most circumstances is the place of publication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Wood, Flaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.