International Administrators, Inc. And Sheldon Harrison v. Life Insurance Company of North America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it “manifestly unfair and inappropriate, absent compelling reasons . . . to disapprove” of a court’s choice of law when neither party objected
• granting summary judgment to insurance company on tortious interference claim because insurance company’s statements in non- renewal letters to insureds were of equal or greater value to the interests of the plaintiff
• “Conflicts rules are appealed to only when a difference in law will make a difference to the outcome.”
• “Conflicts [of law] rules are appealed to only when a difference in law will make a difference to the outcome.”
• “Conflicts [of law] rules are appealed to only when a difference in law will make a difference to the outcome.”
• “Either the Policyholder or the Company may terminate this policy on the first or any subsequent anniversary of the date of issue by written notice mailed or delivered to the other at least 30 days prior to the effective date of termination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).