Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/16/1988
Vinson v. Marton & Associates
Citations
- 764 P.2d 736
- 159 Ariz. 1
- 7 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 46
- 1988 Ariz. App. LEXIS 389
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a court’s decision is moot for appellate purposes when appellate action would have no effect on the parties due to a change in circumstances before the appellate decision
- “A decision becomes moot for purposes of appeal whe[n] . . . action by the reviewing court would have no effect on the parties.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kleinschmidt, Brooks, Eubank
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bt Capital v. Td Service Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 2012-05-04· cited 59×
- Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-04-24· cited 58×
- Chandler Medical Building Partners v. Chandler Dental GroupCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-05-25· cited 57×
- MacCollum v. PerkinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-03-13· cited 47×
- Sitton v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-09-05· cited 36×
- Hall v. World Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-04-22· cited 30×
- United States v. Apex Oil Co., Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2009-08-25· cited 30×
- S & R PROPERTIES v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-09-28· cited 21×
- Church of the Isaiah 58 Project of Arizona, Inc. v. La Paz CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-09-12· cited 12×
- Hormel v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-05-27· cited 9×
- Ciulla v. Miller ex rel. Arizona Highway Dept.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-05-07· cited 4×
- Bt Capital, LLC v. Td Service Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-09-28· cited 1×
- Ciulla v. MILLER, EX REL. HWY. DEPT., MVDCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-05-07
- State of Arizona v. Jay David Ramsey, Sr.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-11-30
- United States v. Apex Oil Company, IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 2009-08-25
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-08-05· cited 105×
- Blackmon v. HaleCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-01-15· cited 57×
- Fortugno v. Hudson Manure Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1958-07-23· cited 51×
- Sahf v. Lake Havasu City Ass'n for the Retarded & HandicappedCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-06-17· cited 47×
- Arizona State Board of Directors for Junior Colleges v. Phoenix Union High School DistrictArizona Supreme Court· 1967-03-08· cited 46×
- MacKey v. SpanglerArizona Supreme Court· 1956-10-02· cited 44×
- Webb v. Crane Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1938-06-27· cited 44×
- Del Rio Land, Inc. v. HaumontArizona Supreme Court· 1973-10-11· cited 30×
- Kristerin Development Co. v. Granson InvestmentSupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-10-15· cited 29×
- Stone-Fox, Inc. v. Vandehey Development Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-04-07· cited 28×
- Owens v. Palos Verdes MonacoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-05-10· cited 26×
- Edwards v. Hanna Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1966-06-08· cited 23×
- Freeman v. Wintroath Pumps—Division of Worthington Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-10-09· cited 22×
- In Re Dutch Inn of Orlando, Ltd., Debtor. Donald Schupak v. Dutch Inn of Orlando, Ltd.Fifth Circuit· 1980-03-27· cited 21×
- Edward Greenband Enterprises of Arizona v. PepperArizona Supreme Court· 1975-07-15· cited 19×
- Grummel v. HollensteinArizona Supreme Court· 1962-01-17· cited 18×
- Haberer v. NewmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-05-08· cited 17×
- Saballus v. TimkeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1983-12-30· cited 16×
- Underdown v. UnderdownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1924-02-18· cited 15×
- Ball v. CarlsonColorado Court of Appeals· 1981-12-10· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.