Skip to main content
· 5/8/1976

Haberer v. Newman

Citations

  • 549 P.2d 975
  • 219 Kan. 562
  • 1976 Kan. LEXIS 399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that compliance with a judgment, even after issuance of an execution, may bar an appeal because “anything which savors of acquiescence in a judgment cuts off the right of appeal”
  • court rejected defendants’ claim that their actions were done involuntarily under threat of being held in contempt of court; acquiescence therefore found and right to appeal foreclosed
  • the trial court awarded specific performance to the vendee of certain property. The vendor appealed the judgment and then voluntarily conveyed the property to the vendee. The appeal was thereby found moot
  • “In an appeal from a judgment of a district court granting specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the acts of the appellants following entry of the judgment savor of acquiescence and the appeal is dismissed. [Emphasis added.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Owsley, Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.