California Court of Appeal· 4/23/2004
Viner v. Sweet
Citations
- 12 Cal. Rptr. 3d 533
- 117 Cal. App. 4th 1218
- 2004 Daily Journal DAR 4963
- 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3533
- 2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 600
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- splitting 2-1 over question whether seller was entitled to new trial to demonstrate that retaining stock would have had value as more than mere \corporate opportunity\
- no evidence that the plaintiff would have been able to secure better terms from the other party to a sale of business transaction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Perluss, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- American Master Lease LLC v. Idanta Partners, Ltd.California Court of Appeal· 2014-05-05· cited 95×
- Gibbons v. LudlowSupreme Court of Colorado· 2013-07-01· cited 51×
- Mayes v. BryanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-04-25· cited 40×
- Licudine v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-09-29· cited 38×
- Wood v. JamisonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-09-30· cited 26×
- In Re Baby Boy M.California Court of Appeal· 2006-07-19· cited 18×
- Ludlow v. GibbonsColorado Court of Appeals· 2011-11-10· cited 5×
- Elmo, et al. v. Callahan, et al.D. New Hampshire· 2012-08-24· cited 4×
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Tiffany M.California Court of Appeal· 2006-07-19· cited 1×
- Wise v. DLA PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-10-28
- Diaz v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-07-23
- American Master Lease v. Idanta PartnersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-05-27
- Sherman v. Ellis, EsquireSuperior Court of Delaware· 2020-01-02
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court· 2001-07-11· cited 2,941×
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court· 1994-10-27· cited 844×
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2001-08-06· cited 637×
- Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1997-08-28· cited 426×
- In Re AlvernazCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 381×
- Dyer v. MacDougallSecond Circuit· 1952-12-31· cited 372×
- Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-11-05· cited 291×
- Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court· 1944-12-28· cited 247×
- Shell Oil Co. v. Winterthur Swiss InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1993-01-21· cited 212×
- Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-04-28· cited 207×
- Viner v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court· 2003-06-23· cited 186×
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-02-26· cited 173×
- California Shoppers, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal· 1985-11-26· cited 170×
- In Re ResendizCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-04-02· cited 164×
- Henrioulle v. Marin Ventures, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1978-01-19· cited 65×
- Sagadin v. RipperCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-12-19· cited 58×
- Pigeon Point Ranch, Inc. v. PerotCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-02-26· cited 53×
- Heckmann v. AhmansonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-05-14· cited 49×
- Cassista v. Community Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1993-09-02· cited 43×
- McCoy v. Hearst Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1991-03-01· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.