VIGILANT INS v. Hous. Auth.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that article 8 “governs stocks, bonds and other evidences of indebtedness”
• holding Article 3 inapplicable to bearer bonds
• “Conversion is the unauthorized assumption and exercise of the right of ownership over goods belonging to another to the exclusion of the owner’s rights.”
• “accrual runs from the date the conversion takes place ... and not from discovery or the exercise of diligence to discover”
• “Conversion is the unauthorized assumption and exercise of the right of ownership over goods belonging to another to the exclusion of the owner’s rights.”
• “[Ajccrual runs from the date the conversion takes place, and not from discovery or the exercise of diligence to discover.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).