Enron Corp. v. Springfield Associates, L.L.C. (In Re Enron Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Laying out three reasons why, “with respect to disallowance, the plain language of section 502(d) reveals that disallowance cannot be fixed on the petition date.”
• Laying out three reasons why, “with respect to disallowance, the plain language of section 502(d) reveals that disallowance cannot be fixed on the petition date.”
• Laying out three reasons why, “with respect to disallowance, the plain language of section 502(d) reveals that disallowance cannot be fixed on the petition date.”
• Laying out three reasons why, “with respect to disallowance, the plain language of section 502(d) reveals that disallowance cannot be fixed on the petition date.”
• Laying out three reasons why, “with respect to disallowance, the plain language of section 502(d) reveals that disallowance cannot be fixed on the petition date.”
• stating “[t]he unnecessary breadth of the Bankruptcy Court’s decisions threatened to wreak havoc on the markets for distressed debt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).