Vigil v. Haber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that “no man should take advantage of his own wrong” 12 (alteration, internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• rejecting rule that ownership of engagement ring should turn on respective fault of parties leading to broken engagement; commenting on unseemly spectacle in which parties reveal highly personal information in effort to demonstrate the other’s fault
• rejecting rule that ownership of engagement ring should turn on respective fault of parties leading to broken engagement; commenting on unseemly spectacle in which parties reveal highly personal information in effort to demonstrate the other's fault

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).