Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office Solution

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the validity of the relevant market is typically a factual rather than a legal analysis
• holding that a motion to dismiss cannot “hinge on factual disagreements rather than legal deficiencies”
• concluding that allegedly false statements were sufficiently disseminated because they were made in promotional literature distributed to thousands of sales accounts
• holding that under certain circumstances “the threat of suit is enough to create standing”
• holding that plaintiff who had already filed a fraud suit under the Sherman Act, Lanham Act, and RICO had standing to seek a declaration that the defendant’s fraudulently procured contracts were invalid
• stating that there is no requirement to plead with specificity the existence of market power in a relevant market

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).