Veltmann v. Walpole Pharmacy, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the complaint’s pleading deficiency makes it “virtually impossible to ascertain . . . which defendant committed which alleged act” for defendants to defend the claims against them
• granting motion to dismiss based on the plaintiff’s lack of standing to bring action for wrongful death, because they failed to allege that they were bringing the suit as a personal representative of the deceased
• dismissing a complaint based on the plaintiffs’ lack of standing to bring a wrongful death action because the plaintiffs failed to allege that they were bringing the suit as personal representatives, as opposed to merely relatives, of the deceased
• dismissal appropriate when plaintiff’s complaint made general allegations against all of the named defendants, making it “virtually impossible to ascertain . . . which defendant committed which alleged act”
• dismissal appropriate when plaintiff’s complaint made general allegations against all of the named defendants, making it “virtually impossible to ascertain . . . which defendant committed which alleged act”
• dismissal appropriate when plaintiff’s complaint made general allegations against all of the named defendants, making it “virtually impossible to ascertain . . . which defendant committed which alleged act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).