Velasquez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rule of lenity did not apply because second degree forgery requires intent to defraud, an element not required to show possession of a false identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Vasquez
  Washington Supreme Court· 2013-07-25· cited 166×
• Metts v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-04-06· cited 27×
• Gordon v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-11-23· cited 25×
• Nelson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-03-02· cited 6×
• Walker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-02-07· cited 5×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-06-26· cited 2×
• Richardson v. Phillips
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-06-03· cited 1×
• William Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-06-26

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dixon v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-05-03· cited 54×
• Lawson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-02-14· cited 29×
• Dyous v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-03-12· cited 10×
• Coffee v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1963-09-05· cited 10×
• Heard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-02-17· cited 7×
• Browning v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-05-14· cited 6×
• Goldstein v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1956-09-20· cited 6×