Heard v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• forgery in the first degree does not contain a requirement of pecuniary damage; it only requires an intent to defraud coupled with the possession of an altered writing and delivery thereof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Grimes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-07-21· cited 11×
• Velasquez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-11-23· cited 9×
• Watson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-11-10· cited 6×
• Tucker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-02-05· cited 4×
• Cade v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-07-08· cited 3×
• Rowan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-10-04· cited 1×
• Richard Dean Rowan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-10-04

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Taylor v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1973-01-29· cited 17×
• Curtis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1959-06-26· cited 9×