Vaughn v. State
Citations
- 52 Fla. 122
Syllabus
<p>CRIMINAL LAW — EVIDENCE—ANIMUS OF WITNESB — REASONABLE DOUBT.</p> <p>1. It is error to refuse to permit the defendant on the cross-examination of a State witness to interrogate such witness as to whether he had made threats of doing violence to the defendant. Great latitude is allowed in the cross-examination of a witness that tends to expose the animus of such witness.</p> <p>2. It is error to charge the jury that .a reasonable douht is “a doubt which would satisfy a reasonable man.”</p>
Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 157×
- Alford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-01-15· cited 36×
- Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 34×
- Bryan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 33×
- Driggers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1896-06-15· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.