Skip to main content

Vaughn v. State

Citations

  • 52 Fla. 122

Syllabus

<p>CRIMINAL LAW — EVIDENCE—ANIMUS OF WITNESB — REASONABLE DOUBT.</p> <p>1. It is error to refuse to permit the defendant on the cross-examination of a State witness to interrogate such witness as to whether he had made threats of doing violence to the defendant. Great latitude is allowed in the cross-examination of a witness that tends to expose the animus of such witness.</p> <p>2. It is error to charge the jury that .a reasonable douht is “a doubt which would satisfy a reasonable man.”</p>

Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.