Vanguard Engineering, Inc. v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying liberal rule of construc- tion to interpret self-represented defendant’s answer, although ‘‘not artfully pleaded,’’ as ‘‘adequately set[ting] forth both a general denial and a claim for setoff’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• City of New Haven v. Bonner
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-01-18· cited 46×
• Travelers Property & Casualty Co. v. Christie
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-03-06· cited 17×
• Carney v. Lopez
  D. Connecticut· 2013-03-28· cited 15×
• American Express Centurion Bank v. Head
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-06-09· cited 12×
• Bernard v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2011-12-07· cited 6×
• Milford Redevelopment & Housing Partnership v. Glicklin
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2024-10-15· cited 3×
• State v. Sebben
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-11-17
• Idlibi v. Hartford Courant Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-08-27

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Macomber v. Travelers Property & Casualty Corp.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-09-03· cited 131×
• Thompson & Peck, Inc. v. Harbor Marine Contracting Corp.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-04-14· cited 88×
• Daley v. McClintock
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-01-20· cited 24×
• Hill v. Williams
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-01-28· cited 22×
• Baldwin v. Jablecki
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-03-23· cited 12×
• Sheiman v. Sheiman
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-09-10· cited 6×