Sheiman v. Sheiman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s ruling on motion in limine precluding testimony from treating psychiatrist as privileged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lambert v. Donahue
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-08-05· cited 30×
• Zirinsky v. Zirinsky
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-02-08· cited 19×
• Ambrogio v. Beaver Road Associates
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-12-30· cited 17×
• Doe v. Rapoport
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-11-04· cited 14×
• Vanguard Engineering, Inc. v. Anderson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-05-18· cited 10×
• Clougherty v. Clougherty
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2016-02-09

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ireland v. Ireland
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-18· cited 120×
• Schult v. Schult
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-22· cited 56×
• Barasso v. Rear Still Hill Road, LLC
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-06-26· cited 43×
• State v. Hair
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-03-26· cited 15×
• State v. Hair
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-05-15· cited 14×
• Mikolinski v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-11-09· cited 10×
• Federal Deposit Insurance v. Caldrello
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-01-25· cited 8×
• Lane v. Lane
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-07-10· cited 3×