Vanderwerff v. Consumers Gas Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “A use must be apparent to be the subject of an implied easement on the severance of ownership. Such use however, need not be plainly visible; it is apparent when it may be discovered upon reasonable inspection.”
• \Easements by implication require no deed or writing to support them and they pass by a conveyance of the estates to which they are appurtenant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Broadhead v. Terpening
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1992-12-31· cited 40×
• Tosh v. Witts
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-04-18· cited 28×
• DePIETRO v. TRIANO
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-07-20· cited 23×
• Spaeder v. Tabak
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1952-01-17· cited 22×
• Hillary Corp. v. United States Cold Storage, Inc.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1996-06-28· cited 16×
• Sobien v. Mullin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-08-31· cited 10×
• Klugman v. Sausman Enterprises, Inc.
  Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 1975-12-16· cited 1×
• Holden v. Moser
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-03-16
• Snyder v. Oswalt
  Somerset County Court of Common Pleas· 1984-10-26
• Frankford Trust Co. v. Manufacturers Life Insurance
  Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1968-11-04
• Ernst v. Kwik-Chek Realty Co.
  Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1972-12-06

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chadwick v. Collins
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1856-07-01· cited 12×
• Harlow v. Whitcher
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1884-02-25· cited 6×