Broadhead v. Terpening

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing two types of easements by necessity— those involving “ways of necessity” from those “involving matters that may be highly convenient or essential to the full enjoyment of the land”
• “ ‘[e]asements by necessity and by implication are appurtenant to the dominant estate and run with land’ ”
• easements by necessity run with the land and are deeded with each conveyance regardless of description
• defendants were on notice of exact relief being sought and were on notice to defend against claim based on easement by necessity and there was no objection to plaintiff's motion to amend
• defendants were on notice of exact relief being sought and were on notice to defend against claim based on easement by necessity and there was no objection to plaintiff's motion to amend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).