Skip to main content
· 10/10/1991

Van Schouwen v. Connaught Corp.

Citations

  • 782 F. Supp. 1240
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14595
  • 1991 WL 292975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because count III alleges Connaught’s breach of a promise to the debtor to answer for his tax liability to the government, the [Statute] defense is not pertinent”
  • “[M]otions to strike . . . are often interposed to create a delay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brian Barnett Duff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.