In Re Marriage of Carlson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pension funds could be ordered to pay the former spouse directly
• holding that pension funds could be ordered to pay the former spouse directly
• finding that the former wife was a co-owner of the former husband’s pension, and she was not his creditor because she was only seeking to recover her interest in the pension benefits
• explaining a QDRO is \a creature\ of the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) (29 U.S.C. §1001 et seq. (1988)) and does not apply to public pension plans
• explaining a QDRO is “a creature” of the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) (29 U.S.C. §1001 et seq. (1988)) and does not apply to public pension plans

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).