Van Emmerik v. Colosi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although the [divorce] action abates,” a “transfer of property in alleged violation of [a] preliminary injunction” remains as a “viable [claim] for resolution in the probate [court].”
• “Although the [divorce] action abates,” a “transfer of property in alleged violation of [a] preliminary injunction” remains as a “viable [claim] for resolution in the probate [court].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-04-06· cited 61×
• Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance v. Ensley
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-04-06· cited 2×
• Porenta v. Porenta
  Utah Supreme Court· 2017-11-15· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Super. Ct. in & for Maricopa Cty.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-01-30· cited 98×
• Marvin Johnson, PC v. Myers
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1995-12-14· cited 54×
• Drahos v. Rens
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-12-13· cited 45×
• State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-02-28· cited 23×
• Hanrahan v. Sims
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-07-19· cited 21×
• Lonergan v. Strom
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-02-28· cited 20×
• Maricopa County v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-12-31· cited 19×
• In Re Marriage of Hilke
  California Supreme Court· 1992-12-17· cited 19×
• Swick v. Swick
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1993-11-23· cited 17×
• State Compensation Fund v. Foughty
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-11-19· cited 8×
• In Re the Marriage of Connell
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1994-02-10· cited 7×
• Allen v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-05-14· cited 6×