Van Campen v. Upjohn Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to find good cause where service was made four days after the one-year time period
• trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to find good cause where service was made four days after the one-year time period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Maher v. Urman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-12-20· cited 31×
• Mission Insurance v. Nethers
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-08-04· cited 25×
• Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Maricopa County Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-02-13· cited 25×
• Peters v. M & O Construction, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-05-11· cited 11×
• Cook v. Superior Court of Maricopa County
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-02-02· cited 7×
• Gonzalez v. Tidelands Motor Hotel Co.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-05-18· cited 4×
• Gittner-Louviere Engineering, Inc. v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-06-09· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lenslite Co. v. Zocher
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-01-08· cited 25×
• Grobe v. McBryde
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-05-07· cited 24×
• Arizona Land & Stock Co. v. Markus
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1931-02-18· cited 15×
• Sato v. First National Bank of Arizona
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-05-28· cited 12×
• Taylor v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF MARICOPA
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-09-03· cited 12×