Skip to main content
· 11/25/2003

Valdes v. Swift Transportation Co.

Citations

  • 292 F. Supp. 2d 524
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21348
  • 2003 WL 22768822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the Section One exemption is “merely an exemption” and not a “substantive pronouncement that [arbitration] clauses in transportation workers’ contracts are unenforceable”
  • “allegations fail to support a finding of unconscionability . . . in light of the fact that the [arbitration] clause appears in a section directly above the signature line”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.