Skip to main content
· 1/15/1976

Equitable Lumber Corp. v. IPA Land Development Corp.

Citations

  • 38 N.Y.2d 516
  • 344 N.E.2d 391
  • 18 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 273
  • 381 N.Y.S.2d 459
  • 98 A.L.R. 3d 577
  • 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • accepting as proper language appearing on back of contract above signature line
  • “The doctrine of unconscionability seeks to prevent sophisticated parties with grossly unequal bargaining power from taking advantage of less sophisticated parties.”
  • fee must be “reasonably related to the normal fee an attorney would charge” absent fee shifting arrangement
  • “[T]he parties are commercial entities dealing at arm’s length . . . [and] cannot assume the posture of a commercially illiterate consumer beguiled into a grossly unfair bargain by a deceptive vendor or finance company.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gabrielli

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.