Skip to main content
· 5/14/1956

Vacca v. Stika

Citations

  • 122 A.2d 619
  • 21 N.J. 471
  • 1956 N.J. LEXIS 254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • broadening the doctrine by requiring representative parties to assert counterclaims in one suit because otherwise a single action would be nothing more than \the trigger which ... would start the chain reaction of other litigation.\
  • broadening the doctrine by requiring representative parties to assert counterclaims in one suit because otherwise a single action would be nothing more than “the trigger which ... would start the chain reaction of other litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vanderbilt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.