US SEC. INS. v. Magnetic Imaging Sys.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statutory interest claim for late payment under section 627.736(4)(b)(c), Florida Statutes, is arbitrable to the same extent as any other portion of the claims dispute involving medical benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rittman v. Allstate Ins. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-10· cited 30×
• Orion Ins. v. Magnetic Imag. Systems I
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-02· cited 21×
• Superior Ins. Co. v. Libert
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-02· cited 5×
• Union American Insurance Co. v. U.S.A. Diagnostics, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-09· cited 2×
• Stone v. Jackson National Life Insurance Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-08
• BAKER FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC, LLC A/A/O HAHN DINH vs LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-02-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 4,474×
• Arrieta v. Volkswagen Ins. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-03-15· cited 33×
• Beaver Coaches, Inc. v. REVELS NAT. RV SALES, INC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-12· cited 23×
• Fenster v. Makovsky
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1953-10-09· cited 17×
• Kaufman v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-31· cited 12×