Skip to main content
· 2/26/1997

US SEC. Ins. Co. v. Silva

Citations

  • 693 So. 2d 593
  • 1997 WL 78409

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that term “benefits” in section 627.736(7) “means payments, and not medical treatment as [insured] suggests”
  • insured failed to appear for third scheduled IME without explanation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbitt, Goderich and Sorondo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.