Custer Medical Center v. United Automobile Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “this Court has definitively expressed that certiorari cannot be used to grant a second appeal to correct the existence of mere legal error”
• finding the Third District’s decision in De Ferrari “inapposite” because it pertained to “uninsured motorist benefits, and did not address PIP coverage”
• equating analysis of whether circuit court applied the correct law to whether it departed from the essential requirements of law
• finding the Third District’s decision in De Ferrari “inapposite” because it pertained to “uninsured motorist benefits, and did not address PIP coverage”
• equating analysis of whether circuit court applied the correct law to whether it departed from the essential requirements of law
• quashing decision granting second- tier certiorari and emphasizing that the district court \neither clarified what the circuit court held below nor did it analyze or address why this holding departed from the essential requirements of the law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).