Skip to main content
· 9/14/2000

U.S. Quest Ltd. v. Kimmons

Citations

  • 228 F.3d 399
  • 2000 WL 1300363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that reliance is an element of common law fraud and statutory fraud
  • applying Texas law and concluding that merger clause showed parties \intended to abandon any alleged agreement to enter a second written contract\
  • applying Texas law and concluding that merger clause showed parties \intended to abandon any alleged agreement to enter a second written contract\
  • applying Texas law and concluding that merger clause showed parties “intended to abandon any alleged agreement to enter a second written contract”
  • applying Texas law and concluding that merger clause showed parties “intended to abandon any alleged agreement to enter a second written contract”
  • securities fraud laws generally embody same elements of common-law fraud, including intent to induce reliance on misrepresentation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Smith, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.