U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Muma
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 629
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by denying appellants/third-party plaintiffs' Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment where the trial court found it necessary to dismiss appellants' third-party complaint filed against appellee/third-party defendant pursuant to Civ.R. 41(B) when appellants failed to perfect service of process of their amended complaint on appellees even after being explicitly instructed by the trial court to do so.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that restitution orders entered six months after sentencing did not violate double jeopardy principles where sentencing court had expressed intent to determine full amount later
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.