In re A.M.D.
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1419
Syllabus
Trial court did not err in denying Mother's Motion for Relief From Judgment pursuant to Civ.R. 60(B) where Mother failed to establish sufficient operative facts that she would have a meritorious claim or defense should relief be granted; she has improperly classified arguments under Civ.R. 60(B)(5) that should fall under (B)(1-3) and are accordingly time-barred; Mother's motion was not filed within a reasonable time where she was or should have been aware of the basis for each of her arguments; and several of her arguments are barred by res judicata.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-07-21· cited 2,230×
- Caruso-Ciresi, Inc. v. LohmanOhio Supreme Court· 1983-05-25· cited 340×
- Coulson v. CoulsonOhio Supreme Court· 1983-05-18· cited 232×
- Bowman v. LeiszOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-27· cited 22×
- Lebanon v. BallingerOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-31· cited 14×
- Ostigny v. BrubakerOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-05· cited 13×
- Myers v. LawsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-17· cited 7×
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. MumaOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-08· cited 4×
- In re C.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-29· cited 2×
- Steve Robertson Trucking, L.L.C. v. ToddOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-29· cited 1×
- Hill v. DorgerOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-17· cited 1×
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. ChibindaOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-07· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.