California Supreme Court· 7/1/1881
Urton v. Price
Citations
- 57 Cal. 270
Syllabus
<p>Satisfaction—Tort.—In action against two persons for damages, resulting from personal injury, the jury found that the plaintiff had received satisfaction for the injury alleged in the complaint from one of the defendants. Held, that he could not recover from the other defendant.</p>
Judges: McKinstry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ash v. MortensenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1944-08-11· cited 100×
- Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court· 1884-11-28· cited 97×
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. StarleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1946-06-18· cited 75×
- Donaldson v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Georgia· 1897-07-27· cited 51×
- Dawson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court· 1892-02-04· cited 44×
- Louisville & Evansville Mail Co. v. Barnes' Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1904-03-16· cited 31×
- Butler v. AshworthCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-12-30· cited 23×
- Barbarich v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1932-03-22· cited 15×
- Burke v. W. R. Chamberlin & Co.California Court of Appeal· 1942-04-25· cited 10×
- Wardell v. McConnellNebraska Supreme Court· 1889-01-15· cited 8×
- Oil Tool Exchange, Inc. v. SchuhCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1944-12-13· cited 4×
- Bryant v. ReedNebraska Supreme Court· 1892-05-19· cited 3×
- Estate of HillCalifornia Superior Court, San Francisco County· 1886-02-27
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.