Fourth Circuit· 10/7/2003

United States v. Wills

Citations

346 F.3d 476
2003 WL 22293602

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that indictment is generally valid if it tracks language of statute defining offense charged
stating that Ring does not require aggravating factors to be alleged in the indictment
affirming the district court’s ruling to admit clips from the movie Casino as relevant to help explain a reference the defendant made during a tape‐recorded conversation
affirming the district court's ruling to admit clips from the movie Casino as relevant to help explain a reference the defendant made during a tape-recorded conversation
finding transcripts of recorded telephone conversations between defendant and his brother could be admitted, despite the brother’s statements being hearsay, because they provided context to the defendant’s own statements
affirming decision to admit excerpts of the film The Casino to explain what one defendant meant when he stated in a tape-recorded conversation, “I’m Casino.... You see the movie? ... Well anyway, I was doing a Casino joint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Motz, Widener, Wilkinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Other cases named United States v. Wills

21 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.