United States v. Willis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• limiting the holding’s precedential value “to cases presenting indistinguishable facts in all material respects”
• \There is no question but that the second revocation sentence is multiplicitous in its own right.\
• “It is by now well-established that a defendant may not use the appeal of a revocation of supervised release to challenge an underlying conviction or original sentence.”
• “It is by now well-established that a defendant may not use the appeal of a revocation of supervised release to challenge an underlying conviction or original sentence.”
• “It is by now well-established that a defendant may not use the appeal of a revocation of supervised release to challenge an underlying conviction or original sentence.”
• appeal of supervised-release revocation no basis for challenge to underlying conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Richard Fuentes
  Fifth Circuit· 2018-10-11· cited 32×
• United States v. Johnson
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-07-16· cited 3×
• United States v. Leleaux
  Fifth Circuit· 2010-02-12

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gall v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2007-12-10· cited 20,598×
• United States v. Pepper Sue Hinson
  Fifth Circuit· 2005-10-21· cited 210×
• United States v. Reyna
  Fifth Circuit· 2004-01-28· cited 175×
• United States v. James Berry, Jr.
  Fifth Circuit· 1992-11-05· cited 79×
• United States v. Frank David Francischine
  Fifth Circuit· 1975-06-30· cited 75×
• United States v. McKinney
  Fifth Circuit· 2008-03-07· cited 66×
• United States v. Moody
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-12-21· cited 46×