Skip to main content
· 5/11/2001

United States v. William Scott

Citations

  • 250 F.3d 550
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 8809
  • 2001 WL 499171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “rele- vant conduct” may not be the basis of a restitution award under the MVRA unless it is also “charged [convicted] conduct” or covered in a plea agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Ripple, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.