Skip to main content
· 1/3/2005

United States v. Darnell Murry

Citations

  • 395 F.3d 712
  • 66 Fed. R. Serv. 289
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 8
  • 2005 WL 82213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying waiver where district court twice asked defendant if he objected to jury instructions, and defendant responded that he did not
  • “Murry’s lawyer clearly and affirmatively stated that he had no objection to the jury instructions. Any objection was therefore waived and appellate review is precluded.”
  • “In this case, Murry waived his objection to the jury instruction at issue. The trial court asked Murry’s counsel twice whether he had any objections to the instructions and twice he replied definitively that he did not.”
  • “In this case, Murry waived his objection to the jury instruction at issue. The trial court asked Murry’s counsel twice whether he had any objections to the instructions and twice he replied definitively that he did not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Kanne, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.