Skip to main content
· 11/20/1997

United States v. William L. Bauer

Citations

  • 129 F.3d 962
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 33152
  • 1997 WL 721561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that under the plain error standard, this court will only reverse a district court if the error at issue is \palpably wrong\ and likely would have resulted in a different sentence
  • recognizing that the defendant approved the supplement to the PSR
  • concerning the factors the district court must consider before imposing a fine under U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2
  • a sentencing court “must consider the relevant factors and provide a reasoned and reviewable basis for its decision to impose a fine”
  • “The requirement to articulate specific findings may be satisfied by adopting the findings contained in the PSR.”
  • “The requirement to articulate specific findings may be satisfied by adopting the findings contained in the PSR.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Manion, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.