United States v. Carl Hach and Francis Hach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the parties’ frequent, repeated transactions, together with the “attendant established method of payment that include[d] a rudimentary form of credit,” could support the conspiracy conviction
• concluding that the parties’ frequent, repeated transactions, together with the “attendant established method of payment that include[d] a rudimentary form of credit,” could support the conspiracy conviction
• noting that a demonstrated level of mutual trust is circum- stantial evidence of a conspiracy
• noting that answers in the form of a legal conclusion amount to unhelpful opinion testimony
• noting that the evidence of routine deliveries established a “demonstrated level of mutual trust,” and concluding that the evidence presented supported the jury’s verdict
• noting that the evidence of routine deliveries established a “demonstrated (continued...) No. 08-3287 15 notes, standardized transactions do not, by themselves, transform a customer into a coconspirator. United States v. Colon, 549 F.3d 565, 567 (7th Cir. 2008

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).