Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 1/30/1984

United States v. William E. Richards

Citations

  • 723 F.2d 646

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • argument that wages and salaries are not income is “totally lacking in merit”
  • argument that wages and salaries are not income is “totally lacking in merit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henley, Gibson, Fagg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.