Skip to main content
· 2/28/2014

United States v. Carl Taylor

Citations

  • 408 U.S. App. D.C. 356
  • 743 F.3d 876
  • 2014 WL 775471
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because § 1B1.10(b)(2)(A) bars sentence reductions below the applicable amended guideline range, and because [the defendant’s] sentence was already below that range, the district court properly held that a reduction in [the defendant’s] sentence was unavailable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garland, Srinivasan, Silberman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.