· 2/28/2014
United States v. Carl Taylor
Citations
- 408 U.S. App. D.C. 356
- 743 F.3d 876
- 2014 WL 775471
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3807
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because § 1B1.10(b)(2)(A) bars sentence reductions below the applicable amended guideline range, and because [the defendant’s] sentence was already below that range, the district court properly held that a reduction in [the defendant’s] sentence was unavailable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garland, Srinivasan, Silberman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.