Skip to main content
· 8/10/1989

United States v. William A. Floyd

Citations

  • 882 F.2d 235
  • 132 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2175
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12257
  • 1989 WL 92003

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding union official could not be absolved of wrongdoing by claiming the act was done with union authorization un- der the principal recognized in McNamara

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Coffey, Flaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.