United States v. Weld
Citations
- 127 U.S. 51
- 8 S. Ct. 1000
- 32 L. Ed. 62
- 1888 U.S. LEXIS 1962
Syllabus
<p>In order to make a claim against the United States one arising out of a treaty within the meaning of Rev. Stat. § 1066, excluding it from the jurisdiction of the Court of Claims, the right itself, which the petition ma'kes to be the foundation of the claim, must derive its life and existence from some treaty stipulation.</p> <p>A claim against the United States made under the provisions of the act of June 5, 1882, 22 Stat. 98, c. 195, “ reestablishing the Court of Commissioners of Alabama Claims and for the distribution of unappropriated moneys of the Geneva Award,” is not a claim growing out of the treaty of Washington within the sense of the word “.treaty,” as used in Rev. Stat. § 1066.</p> <p>The payment of the expenses of the Geneva Arbitration has not been charged by Congress upon the fund received under the award made there.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing a case involving the predecessor statute to 28 U.S.C. § 1502, and concluding that the “statute contemplates a direct and proximate connection between the treaty and the claim, in order to bring such claim within the class excluded from the jurisdiction of the Court of Claims”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dames & Moore v. ReganSupreme Court· 1981-07-02· cited 518×
- United States v. Realty Co.Supreme Court· 1896-05-25· cited 190×
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1976-04-14· cited 127×
- Michael R. Wood v. The United States, U.S. Customs Service, Northrop Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc., Federal Aviation AdministrationFederal Circuit· 1992-07-13· cited 92×
- Juda v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1984-10-05· cited 77×
- Williams v. HeardSupreme Court· 1891-05-25· cited 71×
- Brown & Williamson, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1982-08-26· cited 29×
- Societe Anonyme des Ateliers Brillie Freres v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1963-01-11· cited 20×
- S. N. T. Fratelli Gondrand v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1964-06-12· cited 17×
- Pam-To-Pee v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1902-12-22· cited 13×
- Eastern Extension, Australasia & China Telegraph Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1913-12-01· cited 12×
- Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1973-05-11· cited 12×
- In re the Appeal of CumminsHawaii Supreme Court· 1911-06-15· cited 11×
- Dwen v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2004-09-14· cited 10×
- Per Aarsleff A/S v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2015-06-05· cited 9×
- Remington Typewriter Co. v. CommissionerBoard of Tax Appeals· 1926-09-22· cited 8×
- Chas. T. Main International, Inc. v. Khuzestan Water & Power AuthorityFirst Circuit· 1981-05-22· cited 6×
- New York Central Railroad v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1928-04-02· cited 5×
- Drier v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1947-04-07· cited 4×
- Global Freight Systems Co. W.L.L. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2017-02-28· cited 3×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named United States v. Weld
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.