Skip to main content
· 8/25/2000

United States v. Wayne Chin

Citations

  • 224 F.3d 121
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the rule ensures that “a defendant [can] confront adverse witnesses in a revocation proceeding”
  • “We hold that the district court must balance the defendant’s right of confrontation with the government’s grounds for not allowing confrontation, and with the reliability of the evidence offered by the government.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam, Pooler, Sotomayor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.