Skip to main content
First Circuit· 12/19/2023

United States v. Walker

Citations

  • 89 F.4th 173

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that whether the defendant played an integral role \is not the correct legal standard\
  • noting that whether the defendant played an integral role \is not the correct legal standard\
  • noting that such a reduction to the offense level can be four levels for a minimal participant, two levels for a minor participant, and three levels if culpability falls somewhere between
  • describing the analysis as requiring \a judgment about the defendant's own conduct and a comparison to the other participants\
  • discussing the \vexing\ nuances of this assessment in small-scale criminal enterprises
  • emphasizing \that comparing participants based on the Guideline factors is critical\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.