United States v. Goergen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court need not accept legal conclusions or formulaic 3 recitations of the elements of a legal claim as true
• holding that the Board engaged in prohibited de novo review in finding a contradiction in a witness’s testimony and making its own finding about that witness’s credibility
• upholding as substantively reasonable a sixty-year sentence for four counts of sexual exploitation of children
• upholding 720-month sentence for 47-year-old man who pled guilty to four counts of sexual exploitation of children where, over a period of several years, he produced pictures and videos of three minor girls engaged in sexually explicit activities
• reasonable juror could find 4 likelihood of confusion despite addition of a word to company 5 name

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).