Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 1/4/2017

United States v. Walker

Citations

  • 844 F.3d 1253
  • 2017 WL 34457
  • 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a time-served sentence for a bank robbery committed by a career offender created an unwarranted sentencing disparity, bolstered by the defendant’s failure to identify a single case with a similar sentence
  • concluding that a sentence was too low in part because the district court had focused 3 Appellate Case: 23-6145 Document: 010111061980 Date Filed: 06/07/2024 Page: 4 on the defendant’s “newfound sobriety” and failed to even mention incapacitation
  • noting that district court can abuse its discretion and impose substantively unreasonable sentence by ignoring relevant factors
  • \[T]he length of the sentence should reflect the harm done and the gravity of the defendant's conduct.\ (quotations omitted)
  • same for a 33-day sentence for bank robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Bacharach, Moritz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.