Tenth Circuit· 1/4/2017
United States v. Walker
Citations
- 844 F.3d 1253
- 2017 WL 34457
- 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 101
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a time-served sentence for a bank robbery committed by a career offender created an unwarranted sentencing disparity, bolstered by the defendant’s failure to identify a single case with a similar sentence
- concluding that a sentence was too low in part because the district court had focused 3 Appellate Case: 23-6145 Document: 010111061980 Date Filed: 06/07/2024 Page: 4 on the defendant’s “newfound sobriety” and failed to even mention incapacitation
- noting that district court can abuse its discretion and impose substantively unreasonable sentence by ignoring relevant factors
- \[T]he length of the sentence should reflect the harm done and the gravity of the defendant's conduct.\ (quotations omitted)
- same for a 33-day sentence for bank robbery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hartz, Bacharach, Moritz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. BarnesTenth Circuit· 2018-05-16· cited 93×
- United States v. WalkerTenth Circuit· 2019-03-25· cited 71×
- United States v. CooksonTenth Circuit· 2019-04-26· cited 58×
- United States v. DerusseTenth Circuit· 2017-06-20· cited 49×
- Bayala v. United States Department of Homeland Security, Office of the General CounselD.C. Circuit· 2016-06-28· cited 39×
- United States v. GiesweinTenth Circuit· 2018-04-16· cited 37×
- United States v. CrosbyTenth Circuit· 2024-10-23· cited 19×
- United States v. SampleTenth Circuit· 2018-08-27· cited 15×
- United States v. WareTenth Circuit· 2024-02-28· cited 8×
- United States v. WillisD. New Mexico· 2019-06-07· cited 7×
- Love v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 2009-10-07· cited 4×
- United States v. WalkerD. Utah· 2017-05-18
- United States v. RochaTenth Circuit· 2025-07-29
- United States v. Guevara-LopezTenth Circuit· 2025-08-04
- United States v. DotyTenth Circuit· 2025-09-03
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-12-10· cited 20,598×
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 7,739×
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-12-10· cited 3,379×
- United States v. PughEleventh Circuit· 2008-01-31· cited 1,303×
- United States v. John Windell ClayEleventh Circuit· 2007-04-03· cited 536×
- United States v. FriedmanTenth Circuit· 2009-02-10· cited 157×
- United States v. Torres-DuenasTenth Circuit· 2006-08-28· cited 113×
- United States v. ParkSecond Circuit· 2014-07-09· cited 86×
- United States v. Mancera-PerezTenth Circuit· 2007-10-01· cited 61×
- United States v. WardSixth Circuit· 2007-10-23· cited 54×
- United States v. FranklinTenth Circuit· 2015-05-11· cited 47×
- United States v. Mark A. MedearisEighth Circuit· 2006-06-27· cited 46×
- United States v. HanrahanTenth Circuit· 2007-11-13· cited 44×
- United States v. Paul MusgraveSixth Circuit· 2014-07-31· cited 42×
- United States v. MiloFirst Circuit· 2007-10-30· cited 10×
- Eurodif S.A. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2007-09-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.