Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 8/27/2018

United States v. Sample

Citations

  • 901 F.3d 1196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “the district court’s reliance on [one factor] as overriding all other sentencing considerations exceeded the bounds of permissible choice”
  • collecting authorities for the proposition that “courts should not rely on a defendant’s wealth in fashioning a sentence”
  • considering the harm inflicted upon a victim as part of the crime’s “seriousness”
  • “The record is clear that the district court imposed a lenient probation sentence because Sample’s high income allowed him to make restitution payments to his victims. Our system of justice has no sentencing discount for wealth.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucero, Hartz, Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.